by Derek Smith 10/19/08
Often
classified broadly as a film
about greed and its grand thesis patly summed up with all the subtlety
of a
liberal Gordon Gecko or Ayn Rand, many critics and historians seem
content with
leaving The Treasure of Sierra Madre on the shelf until a clip
is needed
about the destructive nature of greed or the “badges” line is yet again
drudged
up for a greatest film quotes list. Isn’t
it strange that its most famous line not only
comes from a
periphery character but also from, at least in my opinion, not even one
of its
ten best scenes? Isn’t it even stranger
that this “immortal” line, “I don't have to show you any stinking
badges” has been misquoted
for the
past 60 years and will most likely continue to be misquoted for another
60? Are these oversimplifications and
small
misunderstandings a sign of the most neglected of the unquestioned
classics of
Hollywood’s Golden Age? I certainly
don’t mean neglected in terms of reverence since it’s rare to find the
film
absent from any consensus top 100 list, but its greatness is accepted
as a
given so much that what actually makes it a great film often goes
unmentioned.
Now, I’m
not going to jump in here
and suggest anything radical like the film isn’t about greed, but I
think Ebert
was right to suggest it is a character study more than it’s about gold. The dehumanization of Fred C. Dobbs remains
one of
the most frightening turns of fate in cinema and while the narrative
catalysts of
gold and greed are crucial in this development, at least as much credit
must be
given to John Huston for his astounding use of close-ups.
It’s not in the same league as The
Passion of Joan of Arc, however Huston’s camera is nearly as
attentive to
the ticks
and grooves of Bogart’s face as Dreyer to Falconetti’s.
And while I can’t deny that Bogart didn’t
have the overall range as some of the other greats from the time, the
subtlety of
the expressions he produces, both vocally and facially, as his
character struggles with
the increasingly burdenous task of balancing his humanity with a desire
to forever escape his poverty shows a remarkable control and
efficiency within that range. It was not merely a matter of
growing a beard and throwing some grease on his face - Bogey's already
odd-looking face is distorted in ways I've never seen before,
expressing feelings of anguish, despair and pure rage to a degree he
never again matched.
What also
remains fascinating for me aside from the tandem of Huston and Bogart
is the remarkably complex way the narrative tackles the subject of
greed. So often in film and literature it is portrayed through a
man corrupted by power or wealth, yet here the men are simple and stuck
in the daily struggle to get a meal. Their impulse towards
finding gold is initially based only on a desire to avoid suffering, to
never again have to submit themselves to the humiliation of begging, to
raise themselves to at least to minimum standard of a respectable human
being. Thus, rather than showing greed as a symptom of
corruption, Huston attaches it to need and makes it stick on a far more
universal level than if he had simply showed it as an extension of
having power and/or money. Through these three seemingly typical
men, Treasure of the Sierra Madre
intelligently explores the issues of greed, trust, honor and desire
that none of us can escape. Delivered in the form of a thrilling
adventure film, it embodies the finest attributes of Classical
Hollywood, molding form, content and entertainment into one dense
package.