Reviews
Screening
Log
Favorite
Films (Organized by Year)
Favorite Films
(Organized
by Director)
Masterpieces
Links
E-mail me
|
Koyaanisqatsi,
1983
Godfrey
Reggio's ballet of images
and the masterpiece of his "Qatsi" trilogy was released in 1983 after
over 5 years of on-location shooting. The score, composed by
Philip
Glass, is certainly the most famous aspect and an integral part of the
film,
but it is the completely unique language of sound and image that Reggio
and
Glass co-create that makes it a wonder to behold. Their process
of
working together is quite interesting - rather than writing the score
based on
a finished film, the two men traveled together to all of the locations
and
simultaneously shot and scored the film. This organic process is
necessary for the film to succeed as it does, since for 82 minutes all
the
viewer experiences are visuals (sometimes in fast or slow-motion) and
music.
Koyaanisqatsi
portrays the
destruction that modernization has caused to our natural
environments.
Some, including Roger Ebert (who still liked the film), have accused it
of
"Earth worship" since all of the beautiful sequences of the film are
without humans. While this claim can certainly be supported, I
can't help
but feel they are missing the point. The word "koyaanisqatsi",
a combination of two words from the Hopi language, has most commonly
been
translated to mean "life out of balance". However, Reggio has
also offered the definition "A life that calls for another way of
living". This suggests that he is not hateful towards human
beings,
but rather is suggesting that we simply find ways to live on this
planet
without destroying it.
The editing
of the film is what
ultimately makes it work so splendidly. There is not a dull
moment but
every image, sound, and speed change evokes a different feeling from
the viewer
forcing you to contemplate or reevaluate the way the world works.
Koyaanisqatsi
is certainly not a completely objective film - it has a point of view
and many
people find fault with this. Reggio is making a statement with
this film
and proves that films can achieve deep meaning with pure imagery.
Due to
its lack of narrative it allows your thoughts to flow freely, to agree
or
disagree, and contemplate before reaching your own conclusions.
Any
charge that this film is manipulative is pure absurdity.
The
Northern Hemisphere, more
specifically North America, is the setting and
Reggio
contrasts the last few areas of natural beauty with the overwhelmingly
industrialized areas that are spreading at an exponential rate.
His
contempt for modern, technology-oriented society is clear but Koyaanisqatsi
is a beautiful statement that shows man's follies through the
progression from
nature to modern cities rather than an angry statement suggesting man
leave the
Earth. It may be difficult at first to adjust to such an abstract
film,
but once the images and music begin to flow through you it becomes a
magnificent, eye-opening experience that will leave you thinking for
days after
it's over.
Powaqqatsi,
1988
The second
leg of Godfrey Reggio's
"Qatsi" trilogy focuses on the Southern Hemisphere and is a stark
contrast to the images of Koyaanisqatsi, which focused on the effects
of
technology and modernization on the Northern Hemisphere. The
title
Powaqqatsi comes from two words from the Hopi language that combine to
mean (loosely)
"a being that survives through the destruction of others". The
being in Powaqqatsi is the North (the new world) and the one being
destroyed is
the South (the old world). Through a montage of images and music,
including another beautiful score composed by Philip Glass, Reggio
expresses
his belief that the new way of life driven by technology is placing
many
cultures around the world in danger of extinction. He does not
seem to be
preaching an agenda of anti-technology, but rather shows the
consequences of
what we have done in the past and the danger of where we are heading.
Shot over a
period of five years,
the creation of Powaqqatsi was as grueling and almost as time-consuming
as
Koyaanisqatsi. Reggio and Glass's collaborative creative approach
gives
the film a natural flow that makes it as beautiful and powerful as it
is profound.
Due to its focus on cultures that still follow ancient values and
customs and
the approach of capturing the beauty of this way of living, Powaqqatsi
has
often been accused of glorifying poverty. It seems many people
mistake
the glorifying of people and cultures that are not in step with
ever-quickening
process of globalization and modernization as not only an attack on the
modern
world, but as glorifying something that is no longer relevant or
necessary. Through the rapid changes in technology in recent
years, it
has become that status quo to believe that not only is modernization
the best
direction for all nations to head, but the only one. In
Powaqqatsi, Reggio forces us to rethink these accepted notions and
hopefully
come to the conclusion that both worlds can and should coexist.
As
companion pieces, Koyaanisqatsi
and Powaqqatsi work together brilliantly and pull of the difficult task
of
being both extremely personal, yet very universal films.
Sometimes
dismissed as mere long music videos, though usually not by anyone who
is somewhat
knowledgeable about cinema, these films actually utilize two of the
primary
qualities of film - music and images - better than most films use
either
one. They are so packed with ideas as well as powerful images,
that it is
impossible not to be moved emotionally and intellectually.
Naqoyqatsi, 2002
After two
viewings of the wonderful
Koyaanisqatsi and Naqoyqatsi, I decided to finally view the last part
of the
trilogy, Naqoyqatsi, despite the lack of critical praise showered on
the first
two parts. As I watched the film I understood what Reggio was
attempting
to do, but couldn't shake the feeling that he finally crossed the line
from
relevance to pure hypocrisy. Unlike his previous films,
Naqoyqatsi
contains almost no images of nature - as the trailer says "There is no
more nature." - and in fact very little footage of anything earthly at
all. It does contain another wonderful Philip Glass score and is
compiled
of nothing but music and images, but these images are entirely
computer-generated and edited in the annoying, flashy MTV-style editing
that the
other films somehow managed to avoid, or at least pull off
successfully.
In essence, Naqoyqatsi shows how Reggio is influenced by the very
technology he
claims to despise and rather than engaging the viewer on an
intellectual level,
it steps down to the level of the music video working almost completely
on a
visceral level.
Now, it
might seem like I'm being
very harsh on the film since I won't make the claim that it is entirely
useless. Naqoyqatsi does attempt to make a statement about the
world in
the early 21st Century, but the quick flashes of corporate logos,
pop-culture
icons, and images reflecting technology's oppressive control over our
lives
hardly say anything new. It is possible that it might cause some
viewers
to consider the current status of modern nations, but it's fast pace
makes it
so incoherent that it is more frustrating than thought-provoking.
As the
final piece of what could
have been one of the most important trilogies ever made, it's
hypocritical
nature and failure to say anything important is interesting in
itself. If
the first two films were warnings or premonitions, this is a document
of our
failure as human beings to realize the error of our ways.
Globalization
and all of its negatives - not to say there are no positives but in the
context
of Reggio's vision they are the equivalent of a needle in a haystack -
have
won. The meaning of Naqoyqatisi is "Life as war", but it is a
war that humans are losing because of our ignorance of the damage that
our
modern "conveniences" cause to ourselves and the world around
us. It is not our fault, but the fault of governments and
corporations
that in Reggio's mind are unable or unwilling to consider anything but
the bottom
line and the almighty dollar. The unfortunate thing about this
film is
that all it tells us is that we have lost everything that in the past
has made
us compassionate, caring beings and it's too late to do anything about
it. It may be socially aware, but it is so nihilistic and
fatalistic that
it is irrelevant since it is unwilling to push towards the social
change that
the prior films supported so adamantly.
|