"Gus Van Sant has risen to a
new level of pretentious prickism" - Random man outside theater after
seeing Elephant.
There is no
doubt that Elephant
will inspire heated remarks like the one above, not only because of the
subject
matter (high school shootings) but also due to Van Sant's decisions as
director. The 82-minute film takes place over the course of a
single day
and follows the daily routines of about a dozen high school students of
all
races and social cliques. Using a combination of long-takes and
constantly shifting points of view (to the point of showing some events
several
times from different perspectives) the camera unrelentingly gazes in at
that
lives of these teens yet never penetrates far enough to see what makes
them
tick.
What can be
so frustrating to some
people is the films failure to give insight into the characters
motivations, to
shell out easy answers, or provide us with a false sense of hope that
the
problems occurring throughout the film actually have a solution.
Anyone
entering the theater expecting to come out with a better understanding
of how
something like Columbine could happen will certainly be
disappointed. One
of the films major functions is to show cinema's inability to explain
or cope
with the existential problems of modern life so in a sense it predicts
its own
failure to give answers since it is in fact saying that no answers can
be given.
In this failure, however, is a huge success, for the film is not only
entirely
honest but offers much insight into the role cinema plays in portraying
reality. With all of its long takes and changing points of view,
Van Sant
seemingly attacks the issues at hand from every angle possible yet we
are
endlessly left on the outside looking in.
I don't
want to give the impression
that simply because Elephant does not pretend to know its
characters
motivations, that the film (or its characters) is empty. The
minimalist
style of the film gives the feeling that the students are adrift, more
or less
floating through life with very little direction and so desensitized
that they
are barely able to feel. When we finally follow the killers
around, we
realize that they are surprisingly similar to the other students, at
least from
the outside. Yes, they are picked on but there is nothing that
suggests
that their lives are so meaningless that they would take such a drastic
action. What we do see is that through this desensitization, the
extreme
and the mundane become so mixed together that there is little to no
bridge
between fantasy and reality. How much of this is due to video
games,
television, and the internet? Well, these are definitely factors
that
contribute as suggested by several scenes within the film but there is
some
indecipherable, inexplicable emptiness in the lives of these teens that
cannot
be understood by past generations nor explained by the new
generation. Elephant
exists within this gap, this chasm of emptiness and confusion where
kids become
the parents, fantasy becomes reality and vice versa, and two kids can
walk
through a school shooting everyone in site and still feel nothing.
The one
thing that may surprise
people the most is that despite the topic, Elephant is anything
but a
dramatic or emotional film in the traditional sense. It deals
with its
subjects in an honest, every day matter and treats all of the students
as
equals. The sense of emptiness created by the constant tracking
shots
through the endless hallways is often contrasted by scenes of touching
honesty
that ring true because they are earned. There is one scene where
John has
just dropped the car keys off in the school office because his father
is too
drunk to drive home. Frustrated and alone, he retreats to a break
room
where he tries to compose himself before shedding a few tears.
Another
small yet memorable moment was when Alex, one of the killers, sits in
his room
perfectly playing Beethoven on the piano. After a few minutes he
makes a
small mistake and in frustration messes up more before pounding the
piano and
stopping altogether. These moments show how fragile the
characters are
yet gives them humanity and although we cannot understand them we can
relate to
them.
Van Sant's
understanding of the cinematic process along with his ability to give
us
believable characters helps make Elephant a huge
success. Where
most other filmmakers would either not touch the topic of school
shootings or
take overdramatic approaches and try to provide easy answers, he is
humble
enough to admit that he knows no better than the rest of us yet
intelligent
enough to dramatize the misunderstandings and confusion of such a
situation. Cinema may not be able to solve the world’s problems,
but it
can enlighten and empower us. Without even knowing it, you will
likely
walk out of Elephant with a greater understanding of humanity,
not
because you will have the answers but because you will have more
questions. For
everything it does not say, as much as everything it does, Elephant
is
the most impressive and important film of the year.