The Best of 2005
Hong
Sang-soo's two-part narrative
in Tale of Cinema examines the
cinema's effect on how we view love and see ourselves and others in
relationships. The tonal shift between the film-within-a-film to
the film
outside the film is abrupt and serves as an acute reminder that when
all films
come to an end, we are left suspended in the darkness to navigate
through our
own moral quandaries in the real world. The endless series of
small,
repetitious interactions lead to misunderstandings and misperceptions
and a
film that is quietly observant of the ebbs and flows of human
interaction. This may be the breeziest and most unassuming of the
four
Hong films I've seen, but the emotions and revelations lurking beneath
are
among his most fascinating discoveries.
Knowing
what little I knew about
Gregg Araki - most notably that his Doom Generation was among
the worst
films ever made - I was appalled at the beauty and acuity with which he
approached the controversial topic of child molestation. The two
separate
stories - one of a boy who's self-hatred has led him down the path of
prostitution and the other whose warped memories have him convinced he
was abducted by aliens - converge in one of the year's strangest
and most heartfelt encounters. At times it's difficult to watch,
but the extent to which both boys struggle to confront and come to
terms with their past makes it all worthwhile. Joseph
Gordon-Levitt's commanding screen presence (yes, this is that kid from Third Rock from the Sun) holds
things together and Araki's impressive camerawork and creative color
scheme paints an expressive tableau of the struggle in confronting our
former selves and its necessity in growing as an individual.
Noah
Baumbach's
semi-autobiographical account of the disastrous effects of divorce on
the
traditional family unit has been called an assault on his father by a
number of
critics, but this complaint seems utterly silly in light of the complex
and
layered ways he shows its effect on even the most minor
characters. Daniel's performance as the pretentious
intellectual father suggests not his one-dimensionality, but the myriad
of ways which remaining aloof in the bubble of academia can
ultimately be emotionally destructive. His relationship
with his oldest son makes up the core of the film, but the
multiple, ever-changing aliances between the once tight-nit foursome
form a complex web of secrets and lies that implode in the finale
resulting in one of the years most emotionally honest and tender films.
Heralded as
the next John
Cassavetes by the likes of Ray Carney, Andrew Bujalski's talky and
not-so-hilarious Funny Ha Ha cuts
through the bullshit in a way that few young filmmakers have figured
out.
It's low-budget and not much happens, but the preciseness of the
dialogue, the
tone of his actors and the lingering gaze of the camera presents the
confusion and ennui experienced by many a post-collegiate
twenty-something. At the forefront is the characters inability to
articulate
their
discontent and confusion in the face of the mounting pressure to
instantly
become "mature
adults" and while this could easily have veered into the banal, the
delicate, attentive manner that he focuses on Marnie's attempts
to find a place in the world perfectly express her inner
turmoil. The films deceptively simple approach
leads not to personal epiphanies or discoveries, but a constant stream
of disappointments and awkward conversations that evokes the
mundanity of life after college and the difficult transition into
adulthood.
In yet another
ravishing and
emotionally grandiose film, Wong Kar-Wai shows why he's touted as one
of the
greatest living filmmakers. This is epic filmmaking but in a way
only Wong could successfully bring to the screen - characters and
emotional alliances from his previous films converge in this
beautifully surreal vision of the future where the tyranny of love and
memories reigns supreme. His expressive mise-en-scène and
lush color schemes once again provide a backdrop for his musings on
lost love and man's struggle to confront the effects of time on our
longings to become whole. From my lone viewing, fortunately in
the theater, I can only stress how painfully beautiful this film is and
that what eluded me then will certainly come through in the many times
I see this in the future.
Less concerned with
the actual grizzly
bears than with man's relentless, and failed, attempts to shape nature
to its liking, Werner Herzog brings as another inspired documentary and
evidence that he's just as comfortable working in this format as
fiction. Treadwell's utopian dream is formed not from a true
desire
to see the animals protected, but from his neurotic blend of meglamania
developing from his increasing disdain for mankind and desire to live
with and
like the grizzlies. Considering Herzog's tumultuous
and fascinating relationship with Klaus Kinski over the years, it's
easy to see what attracted him to this material. He allows the
original footage to have its breathing room and his commentary is never
intrusive, always expanding on his unique world view that he has so
generously let us in on over the past 35 years. He's a mad
genius, but also incredibly kind and compassionate and when he shows
Treadwall falling off the tracks, his patience and understanding come
through at a time when most filmmakers would become condescending and
dismissive.
Jia Zhang-ke's The
World certainly
has the most creative premise of any film this year and he follows
through with
a brilliant examination of the dehumanizing effects of global
capitalism, China's transition into the world market, and the
ever-shrinking world readymade for us through modern technology.
His use the World Park (small scale
representations of dozens of the most famous tourist attractions from
around the globe) as a microcosm of the new global community works both
on metaphorical and philosophical levels, which are presented in a
series of comical, surreal or purely dramatic tableaux of the lives of
the park employees. Is the park a commodified version of the
world or has the world become a place where only commodities unite us? The film may not provide us
the answers to the questions it presents, but that it posits them at
all is an impressive feat in itself. It is
less a condemnation of the current state of the world than an attempt
to explain and come to terms with it. In this way, it is not only
one of the best films of the year, but also one of the most immediate
and important.
Kings
and Queen interweaves
the comic and tragic is such original and exciting ways that it seems
to have
created a genre all to itself. At once intensely "French" and
genuinely humane, this is one of those films where you never know
where you're headed, but it always feels right on a purely intuitive,
rather than plotted, way. This is not to say it's not
exceptionally organized as the editing and screenplay are among the
years best, but that it's layering of human interactions against such
vastly different backgrounds as a father dying of cancer on the one
hand and a man mistakenly committed to an insane asylum on the
other, is seemingly simple yet so emotionally satisfying that its
150-minutes pass by in the blink of an eye. Where so many lame
films use the "you'll laugh, you'll cry", this one lives and breathes
it and the brilliant performances of Emmanuelle Devos and Mathieu
Amalric (not to mention Catherine Deneuve whose lovely presence is
always a plus) form the heart which makes this film beat.
Whatever
you want to call Van
Sant's style in his latest three films (heightened realism, perhaps?),
they have
such a unique sense of rhythm, taking the cadence of his vaguely formed
characters and viewing and reviewing them from a careful distance and
from a variety of angles. With Last
Days, my personal favorite of the trilogy, although Elephant is a masterpiece in its
own right, Van Sant transforms the vision of a true icon - one whose
look is ingrained in the American consciousness - into a ghost
lingering in a state of non-existence before quietly exiting the
world. As in Elephant, Last Days focuses less on causes
than effects, the events themselves rather than the psychology behind
them, thus forcing the viewer to account for their significance and
carefully construct their own opinions of Blake, what lead him here,
and what is eating away at him. As the film's time constantly
folds back on
itself only to bolt forward and jump back again, the immense complexity
of even the most simple setups becomes evident and Van
Sant's decision to present only their essence rather than placing them
within an overarching rigid and definitive context shows him as both
supremely generous and artfully brilliant. This use of
time-looping, a
technique featured even more prominently in Elephant, is used throughout to
recontexualize certain moments and events, offering different ways of
seeing and pinpointing the extreme subjectivity that would drive a
more traditional narrative film into banality and
gross oversimplifications. The camera is ever-observant, yet
never
judgmental,
leaving ample room for the viewer to roam and interact with the
images and emotions brought to the screen. As a film
focusing on a suicidal rock musician, the intricacy of the sound
design adds even more resonance. From distant church bells to
serene noises of nature to the few rock music pieces that do show up,
there is a constant interplay between sound and image, at times
presenting Blake's junk-induced reality and other times fighting
against what we see. As empty and disinterested as the film may
seem at first glance, once you make the necessary initial jump, it's
quite an invigorating and rewarding experience.
Terrence
Malick's latest film is
unapologetically romantic in its vision of love amidst the crumbling of
a
natural paradise lost to the imperialistic impulses of the Europeans,
but the tragic story that unfolds is one perfectly suited for this
treatment. Q'Orianka Kilcher is the film's soul and feels so at
home among the gorgeous images in the first act that her transformation
into the proper colonialized Englishwoman feels all the more
powerful. So convincing is the love between Smith and Pocahontas
that her journey to move on and find a place in the other new world
propels the film from its magical depiction of Eden in the opening to
the overwhelmingly bittersweet montage that concludes it.
Malick's imagery is not just for show and his contrasting of landscapes
is particularly relevant to it's themes. The unfettered natural
beauty where Pocahontas and
Smith fell in love is replaced by the man-built stone
buildings and controlled, neatly-trimmed shrubbery and when the two
find themselves
face to face after all those years, it is as they only met in another
dimension. The realization that their love, once
so free and pure, is now dead is matched by the intensity of her
newfound devotion to her child and husband. That she is no
longer
the innocent child we met in the beginning and is now contained within
the society responsible for destroying her people is a tough pill to
swallow, but her core remains strong and untouched by the immense
changes. The furious montage that ends the film, accompanied by
the recurring Wagner piece, reminds us of her immense strength and
inner beauty and functions as a melancholy revery of a time when nature
provided a spiritual sustenance that could not be replaced by religious
or social order.
The Next 10:
Pulse (Kiyoshi
Kurosawa)
Howl's Moving Castle
(Hayao Miyazaki)
Head-On
(Fatih Akin)
A History of Violence
(David Cronenberg)
Best of Youth
(Marco Tullio Giordana)
Tropical Malady
(Apichatpong Weerasethakul)
Nobody Knows (Hirokazu
Kore-eda)
Kung Fu
Hustle (Stephen Chow)
Good Night and Good Luck
(George Clooney)
Rize (David
LaChappelle)